Cedar Creek Campground sits at 9264 Saundersville Road in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, a setting that visitors describe in relation to both the water and the nearby city. The campground holds a 4.5 rating across 560 reviews on the source listing, and its online presence is anchored by a Recreation.gov page. For travelers scanning a Cedar Creek Campground review before booking, the visitor feedback below draws from reviews that mention lake access, campsite conditions, staff interactions, and practical details about arrival and utilities.
Cedar Creek Campground at a Glance
The campground is categorized as a campground and operates in the America/Chicago timezone, with coordinates placing it at roughly 36.2769822 latitude and -86.5108206 longitude. Its listed address is 9264 Saundersville Rd, Mt. Juliet, TN 37122, and the contact phone number is +1 615-754-4947. A dedicated Recreation.gov page serves as the website, and the Google Maps listing is also available for navigation. The source data describes the site with accessibility features, including wheelchair-accessible entrances, parking, and toilets. Parking is noted as available on-site and free, and payments are listed as accepting credit cards and debit cards, with a note about cash-only payment. Pets are permitted, with dogs specifically mentioned as allowed. The campground also lists RV camping as an activity, with camping fees noted, and amenities include public toilets and public showers.
What Do Visitors Like About Cedar Creek Campground?
Visitor feedback is mixed overall, with several reviewers praising the setting and staff while others describe difficult interactions with attendants or maintenance concerns. Positive reviews highlight quiet surroundings, lake proximity, friendly camp hosts, and clean sites. Critical reviews mention bathroom conditions, unclear check-in, and staff conduct. The opinions below are attributed to individual reviewers and reflect their experiences, not a universal assessment.
1. Lake Access and Scenic Setting
Multiple reviewers describe the campground as being right on or very close to the water. A reviewer named Kaja SWIEB called it nice, clean, and in a great location right on the lake, close to shopping and about 30 minutes from Nashville. Another reviewer, R Kim, mentioned a sandy beach and boat dock, describing it as a good place for kids, a picnic, or relaxing. Blackwood noted that the water is close enough to walk to from a campsite, though they warned about sticky sap from trees. Matthew Samples mentioned a few sites backing up to the Cumberland River and an adjacent public recreation area with a playground, volleyball courts, and a swimming area with a disabled access ramp.
2. Site Conditions and Utilities
Mick Williams provided a detailed account of a one-night stay in back-in Site 22, describing 50/30/20-amp electric and water, excellent water pressure, and a newer picnic table, fire ring with cooking grate, and lantern post. They noted the site length was accurately represented on Recreation.gov for their 40-foot fifth wheel but required unhitching to park a tow vehicle alongside. Nanny P described very narrow roads and ditches, advising campers over 32 feet to choose sites carefully, and mentioned that site 55 was 95 feet long but narrow with a need to back in well. Theresa Hopkins and Michelle Rigby both described the campground as nice, with Rigby noting clean sites and a hope to secure a lakeside spot. Matthew Samples noted that some sites are long enough for larger RVs.
3. Staff and Camp Host Experiences
Reviews about staff and camp hosts diverge sharply. Ashley praised Gene and his wife Teresa, saying they treated the group very well and were accommodating during a group stay. Kaja SWIEB called the camp host helpful and friendly, and Theresa Hopkins described Teresa as very helpful. Matthew Samples said the camp host was friendly and directed them to a gate better suited to their RV and tow vehicle. In contrast, Keegan Brown described attendants as rude, confrontational, and more interested in policing campers than providing customer service, and Elijah Noe reported an interaction about idling a vehicle and unclear check-in. These are individual accounts and do not represent all visitors.
4. Noise, Atmosphere, and Wildlife
Several reviewers emphasize quiet and peaceful conditions. Ashley described the campgrounds as very quiet, Joni Barwick called it very quiet and peaceful with birds, deer, and squirrels, and Kaja SWIEB mentioned a lot of wildlife. Matthew Samples described the layout as a one-way-in, one-way-out body of land that makes the visit tranquil. Mick Williams offered a contrasting note that lakeside sites are more generously spaced while interior loops connect to one another, making the back sides feel close together.
5. Bathhouses and Maintenance
Mick Williams observed two bathhouses, with the newer facility offering individual shower rooms and the older bathhouse having two coin-operated machines, one of which was a dryer out of service during their stay. THERESA ALLEN described two bath and restroom areas, calling one horrid and the other decently clean and roomy. Elijah Noe stated that bathrooms had mold, were not clean, and that showers were falling apart. Theresa Hopkins mentioned one washer and one dryer at 1.50 each. These accounts differ and may reflect timing or specific facilities.
6. Practical Arrival and Fees
Mick Williams described the final approach through a narrow, hilly rural-suburban area and noted no brown campground signs until the marina entrance when coming from the south, plus a tight right-hand turn after check-in that an attendant warned them to take wide. Jesse Moe noted an entry fee of about 5 dollars. Nancy Rains described a site on a concrete pad that flooded with about a foot of water after rain, advising future campers to be aware of potential flooding at sites 42 and 43, and also noted that the restaurant and bar were closed. Elijah Noe mentioned unclear check-in procedures.